Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0362420090470010070
Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2009 Volume.47 No. 1 p.70 ~ p.81
Three-dimensional finite element analysis on stress distribution of the mandibular implant-supported cantilever prostheses depending on the designs
Ban Jae-Hyurk

Shin Sang-Wan
Kim Sun-Jong
Lee Jeong-Yeol
Abstract
Statement of problem: The position and length of cantilever influence on the stress distribution of implants, superstructure and bone. In edentulous mandible, implant-supported cantilever prostheses that based 4 or 6 implants between mental foramens has been attempted. Excessive bite force loaded at cantilever prosthesis causes bone resorption and breakage of superstructure prosthesis around posterior implants. To complement the cantilever length of conventional prosthesis, In 1992, (McCartney) introduced "cantilever -rest - implant" and Malo reported "All-on-Four" in 2003.

Purpose: Analyze and compare the stress distribution of conventional cantilever prostheses with rest implant and Allon-FourTM implant prostheses.

Material and method: The external loads(300 N vertically, 75 N horizontally) are applied to first molar area. The stress value, stress distribution and aspect of stress dispersion are analyzed by three-dimensional finite element analysis program, ANSYS ver. 10.0.

Results: 1. The rest implant and¡° All-on-Four¡±implant system are superior to conventional cantilever prostheses to reduce stress on the bone and the superstructure around implants. 2. The rest implant was of the greatest advantage to
stress distribution on bone, implant and superstructure. 3. With same number of implants, distally tilted implants are preferred to conventional cantilever prostheses for reducing the length of cantilever.
KEYWORD
Three-dimensional FEA, Rest implant, All-on-Four, Stress distribution
FullTexts / Linksout information
  
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed